A slide show was shown at a recent ReThink London event with those attending being asked to vote. That slide show is now online and we are again being asked to view the pictures and indicate our preferences. Unfortunately, we are not given the chance to answer: "None of the above."
Ideally this voting activity would have been, at a minimum, a two stage project. First, Londoners should have been encouraged to scour the Internet for images depicting an urban landscape they would like to see emulated here in London. The best images would have been presented for consideration and voting.
Click on the image below to enlarge it and see my improved "ballot."
As I recall image A and image B did not garner many votes. Clearly the audience preferred the modern townhouses (C) and the apartments located above commercial space (D). Now that we know the preferences, let's give folk some better choices.
The image, second from bottom on left, is the Norwalk Town Center in Norwalk, Connecticut. This $200 million initiative looks rather grand for a town of only 86,000 where the estimated per capital annual income in 2009 was only $39, 695. Still, as best as I could determine, the plan is moving ahead.
The image to the immediate right is an artist's conception of a proposed new town centre in Clayton, Ohio. A new urbanist experiment in suburban planning, some of the proposed buildings have been built already. Below is map with inserted illustration of the development.
At the bottom left is an example what comes from using form-based code. This is a method of regulating development with the goal of achieving a specific urban look. Since the goal of this ReThink London project is to develop a new urban plan, maybe Londoners could take some inspiration from the Birmingham planning design guide released in late 2006 and available online.
Lastly, on the bottom right is the new apartment/commercial complex on Dundas Street in Old East London. How many votes do you think this image would attract?
Now, to move on to question two of the ReThink London ballot.
It is interesting to look at the apartment buildings shown and then consider the apartment buildings built recently in London. And then to give some thought to how other southern Ontario cities have approached apartment/condominium designs.
Think of Mississauga. Wanting to make a splash internationally, a development company, Fernbrook/Cityzen, sponsored an international design competition in 2005 for the condo towers it planned for the town centre.
The resulting skyscraper was called the “Marilyn Monroe” by locals for its voluptuous
curves.
"People looking for the latest in twisting, gravity-defying architecture
might start with the international cities of the Middle East or China,
but you wouldn’t expect them to look here, in the suburbs outside
Toronto.
. . . designed by the Chinese architect Ma Yansong, assisted by his partner,
Qun Dang. Sales were so brisk in the 428-unit “Marilyn” tower that the
developers asked the architect to deliver a second, 50-story high-rise
with 433 units."
Like to know more? Watch the video. Mississauga and Fernbrook/Cityzen certainly generated buzz.
When I gushed over her art, Fiona told me firmly: "Gug-gah, I scribble."
A lot of psychologists have come out against praising children, or more accurately against heaping too much praise on children. According to these experts too much praise doesn't build self-esteem but diminishes it. It's a confidence killer.
Originally I had another title on this post and then I read The New York Times article. I immediately shifted gears and my post took off in a new direction. Madeline Levine wrote:
Dr. Carol Dweck, a social and developmental psychologist at Stanford University, takes young children into a room and
asks them to solve a simple puzzle. Most do so with little difficulty.
But then Dr. Dweck tells some, but not all, of the kids how very bright
and capable they are. As it turns out, the children who are not told
they’re smart are more motivated to tackle increasingly difficult
puzzles. They also exhibit higher levels of confidence and show greater
overall progress in puzzle-solving.
This may seem counter-intuitive, but praising children’s talents and
abilities seems to rattle their confidence. Tackling more difficult
puzzles carries the risk of losing one’s status as “smart” and deprives
kids of the thrill of choosing to work simply for its own sake,
regardless of outcomes. Dr. Dweck’s work aligns nicely with that of Dr.
Baumrind, a clinical and developmental psychologist at the University of California, who also found that reasonably supporting a child’s autonomy
and limiting interference results in better academic and emotional
outcomes.
All my life I've been known as a tough critic. My nieces and nephews had to work to impress me, and work they did. Now, as a grandfather, I fear I have lost my harsh edge. I fear I've grown soft. I have turned into a push-over.
Praise, to be beneficial, should be genuine, focused on the child's good effort and hard work and not necessarily the outcome. I read numerous posts on the Web, all agreed the important word here is sincere. Children can sense insincerity. Artificial praise risks damaging trust.
Music playing, Fiona spins as she performs her little dance.
My granddaughter loves to make scribbles in pen and ink and then together we colour some of the open spaces. She picks the colours and the spaces, and I do the colouring. I have really liked some of the art we've created together.
I love the shapes she draws. I love the way she puts pen to page and the bold way she attacks the blank sheet of paper. I've tried emulating her approach; I can't. I over-think my scribbles.
The other day I was gushing over one of her sketches when she turned to me and stopped me dead by telling me firmly, "Gug-gah, I scribble."
Hmmm. Maybe it is time to dial down the praise a notch or two. It might make her a bolder child, willing to tackle the truly challenging stuff — like dance.
Aesha is a shy 18-year-old Afghan woman sentenced by a Taliban commander to have her nose and ears cut off as the penalty for fleeing her abusive in-laws.
Aesha posed for the Time magazine cover photo because she wanted the world to see the effect a Taliban resurgence would have on the women of Afghanistan. Or this is the story being reported by the American media.
Today Aesha has a nose, but only a prosthetic nose. As of May 2012, the psychological damage suffered by the young woman has proven more destructive than her disfigurement. She has mood swings – violent tantrums. According to the British Mail Online, "Her plastic surgery had to be delayed
because (she was emotionally not ready to cope with)the painful and lengthy surgery required."
Aesha is in ruins, physically and emotionally, and so is her homeland.
For another media report, try this link to a New York Times story on another young girl attacked and left for dead in an honour killing.
The last I heard, all Canadian military will be out of Afghanistan after 2014. Canada will continue to financially support the Afghan military for three years with an annual payment of $110-million, but our military presence will be over.
Canada claimed one of its priorities in Afghanistan was to help Afghan women. Are we abandoning this goal as we prepare to leave the Asian country, its society and culture in tatters after decades of war?
I understand the Canadian military is in favour of this action and I can understand why. The story we are told is that Afghanistan is a battle that cannot be won. And they are right, at least when it comes to the present military battle.
Supposedly the country is a brutal, tribal land ruled by vicious war lords. Foreign armies foolish enough to invade, it is said, find themselves mired in a crushing, unending war impossible to win. The history of foreign engagements in the country over almost the past two centuries seems to support this belief.
Afghan women, I've been told, are treated cruelly but that is the Afghan way. There is nothing we can do to save these women. This is a problem that can only be solved by the Afghans themselves.
I'm not a war booster. I find the entire idea of marching off to war repellent, although sometimes it is necessary. As a young man I considered myself very luck to be Canadian and not compelled to fight in Viet Nam like so many of my American friends. I didn't support that Southeast Asian war.
The invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent war seems somewhat similar to that long over Southeast Asian conflict. The sooner the Western military is out the better. Still, Afghanistan seems different from Viet Nam. Under the Taliban Afghanistan seems more like Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge.
There is nothing unique about government-sponsored violence. There is,
in fact, nothing especially unusual about widespread killing, or even
genocide. The rallying cry heard in the wake of World War II — "Never
again!" — is a noble sentiment but not a reflection of reality. Ask
the Indonesians, or the Timorese, or the Salvadorans, or the Rwandans,
or the Albanians . . . or the Cambodians. (Allow me to add, the Afghans to this sad list.)
I'm troubled by our leaving of Afghanistan. It will not be long before all Western armies will have departed. Were we wrong to have entered Afghanistan? Probably. Are we wrong to be leaving? Probably not.
Still, leaving Afghanistan in ruins, its culture and traditional society destroyed, is to leave a vaccuum that may well be filled by the Taliban, religious fanatics, or by the criminal warlords once decried and now, in many cases, enjoying begrudging support by the West. This is a Gordian that cannot be cut, the result simply unravels, we must find a way slowly to untangle the mess that the British, the Russians, the Americans, even the Afghans themselves have created.
I worry I don't know enough to make a thoughtful decision. I do know that every time I try to learn a little about Afghanistan, I come away more confused. What I discovered when I start researching this post didn't jibe neatly with the stories I usually heard and always claimed to reflect "the truth."
Sgt. Kimberly Lamb U.S. Armed Forces-Released by U.S. Army: ID 120627-A-LE308-091
First, the country is not all a complete desert waste land. There are large swaths of the country that one could call lush. Think of the United States. If you have ever traveled the American West, you know what a large chunk of the U.S. is arid desert. But no one would call the United States anything but blessed when it comes farmland. Countries are big places.
Afghanistan is in many ways a blessed land. It was not always hell. Many would argue strongly that the West brought and installed hell in Afghanistan. Is there anyway that as we remove troops from the country that we can take the hell out of the little country as well?
When I began asking questions about women and their place in Afghan culture I found the following published by the U.S. Department of State:
Prior to the rise of the Taliban, women in Afghanistan were protected
under law and increasingly afforded rights in Afghan society. Women
received the right to vote in the 1920s; and as early as the 1960s, the
Afghan constitution provided for equality for women. There was a mood of
tolerance and openness as the country began moving toward democracy.
Women were making important contributions to national development. In
1977, women comprised over 15% of Afghanistan's highest legislative
body. It is estimated that by the early 1990s, 70% of schoolteachers,
50% of government workers and university students, and 40% of doctors in
Kabul were women. Afghan women had been active in humanitarian relief
organizations until the Taliban imposed severe restrictions on their
ability to work. These professional women provide a pool of talent and
expertise that will be needed in the reconstruction of post-Taliban
Afghanistan.
Islam has a tradition of protecting the rights of women and children.
In fact, Islam has specific provisions which define the rights of women
in areas such as marriage, divorce, and property rights. The Taliban's
version of Islam is not supported by the world's Muslims. Although the
Taliban claimed that it was acting in the best interests of women, the
truth is that the Taliban regime cruelly reduced women and girls to
poverty, worsened their health, and deprived them of their right to an
education, and many times the right to practice their religion. The
Taliban is out of step with the Muslim world and with Islam.
Afghanistan under the Taliban had one of the worst
human rights records in the world. The regime systematically repressed
all sectors of the population and denied even the most basic individual
rights. Yet the Taliban's war against women was particularly appalling.
Is the above all true. Yes, but the story is getting some spin.
According to Huma Ahmed-Ghosh: "Afghanistan may be the only country in the world where during the last century kings and politicians have been made and undone by struggles relating to women’s status." But he does agree with the Yanks when he says, "Women in Afghanistan were not always oppressed by fundamentalism as occurred under the Mujahideen and the Taliban."
I know arguing for any continuing involvement by Canada in Afghanistan is not a popular position. I know that few question the wisdom, the morality, of pulling our troops out of Afghanistan. It is not a welcoming country for our military. Still, does our total abandonment of the country after a few additional short years demonstrate wisdom or morality? Would our feelings change if our wives, daughters, granddaughters were threatened by the violence of the resurgent Taliban?
Wanting to know more about Afghanistan, both the history and the present situation, I am posting links to a number of important documentaries that I tracked down on YouTube. The first two are historical and were originally broadcast by the BBC. The next four are the work of two excellent Canadian journalists, David Pugliese and Scott Taylor, who travelled about war torn Afghanistan carefully documenting what they found. Talk about guts. These are two incredible journalists. (I worked with Dave Pugliese when he was a reporter for The London Free Press.)
One approach to assisting the Afghans with minimal military involvement is the use of PRTs (Provincial Reconstruction Teams). The Canadian reporter, Scott Taylor, interviews a Turkish chap about his country's PRTs and their success. Canada supports a number of PRT projects in the Kadahar region.
I found a number of good videos on Afghanistan but the links keep breaking. I am supplying the following plus links but be warned all embedded video and all links may not work by the time you visit.
For part two you will have to google it. Good luck. Also, google Rory Stewart. He is not simply a talking, media head. His views carry weight.
One America woman interviewed in the Canadian documentary, Sarah Chayes, wrote a book, The Punishment of Virtue, detailing her experiences in Afghanistan. We learn from her Internet site:
"The story Chayes tells is a powerful, disturbing revelation of misguided
U.S. policy and of the deeply entrenched traditions of tribal
warlordism that have ruled Afghanistan through the centuries."
"She reveals how the tribal strongmen who have regained power-after years
of being displaced by the Taliban-have visited a renewed plague of
corruption and violence on the Afghan people, under the complicit eyes
of U.S. forces and officials."
When you consider the time and money that the West has dumped in Afghanistan, how does one explain that this little Asian country has the highest infant mortality rate in the world. No place one earth equals Afghanistan at 121. 63 deaths per 1000 live births. Its neighbour, Turkmenistan has a rate of approximately 40, while Uzbekistan is about 20.
But death doesn't just stalk the very young in Afghanistan. The life expectancy at birth is only 49.72 years.
